The TRACE™ Report — Technology Review & Case Assessment — is the signature deliverable across every LTD practice. Whether the engagement is forensic acquisition, eDiscovery audit, or AI governance review, the work ends in a TRACE™ Report.
Every TRACE™ Report follows the same structure: scope and authority, methodology, tooling and validation, findings with cited artifacts, conclusions tied to the question presented, and qualifications of the examiner. The report is written so that a second examiner working from the same evidence and the same methodology would reach the same conclusion.
That's the standard for established industry forensic methodology. It's also the standard for credibility in any setting where the work is reviewed. Carlos's published article Surviving Daubert in the Age of AI (eForensics Magazine) and his Techno Security Conference presentation 25 Lessons That Make or Break Your Case walk through the framework in detail.
A TRACE™ Report is technical enough for a forensic peer to reproduce, and clear enough for a judge or jury to follow.
TRACE™ engagements start with scope confirmation and end with a sealed report. We deliver in engagements where the work has to stand up to documented review — because most of it eventually does.
Start a Conversation →